Review
of Café Society
His fans will no doubt rejoice at the
annual Woody Allen movie, this one called Café
Society, and not terribly different from his last dozen or two dozen
mediocre efforts. (One exception: Blue Jasmine, a very unusual work from
Allen, and a very good movie). Set in
the 1930s and narrated by the writer-director, the film shows the career of a
young man from Brooklyn, Bobby Dorfman (Jesse Eisenberg), who goes to Hollywood
to make a life for himself; he hopes that his uncle, Phil Stern (Steve Carell),
a successful movie agent, will help.
Phil deputizes one of his secretaries,
Vonnie (Kristen Stewart), to show his nephew around town, the Hollywood of a
now romantic past. After a number of
pleasant excursions, the two young people reach a point of mutual affection,
but as it turns out, Vonnie is involved in an affair with Uncle Phil. That discovery drives Bobby back to New York,
where he launches a successful career working for his gangster brother as the maître
d’ in his posh night club.
The movie’s occasionally comic moments
revolve around the amusing Dorfman family, which bears some resemblance to the
family in one of Allen’s better films, Radio
Days. Its emotional elements remain
steadfastly on the surface, with the writer-director telling the audience
pretty much what the two main characters feel about each other. Since neither Jesse Eisenberg nor Kristen
Stewart convey anything resembling genuine passion, they appear merely to be
acting out Allen’s hardly credible lines.
Eisenberg pretty much owns the tiresome role of the naïve young guy,
which he’s played far too often, and though Woody Allen, Jesse Eisenberg, and
Steve Carell constantly proclaim her beauty, Stewart remains a quite ordinary
and quite insipid personality.
The movie looks carefully polished and
authentic, with the cars and clothes and, especially, all the wonderful popular
music of its time. Oddly, nobody refers
to the Great Depression that after all, defined the decade. Café
Society belongs with most of Woody Allen’s recent—actually over a couple of
decades—works: it’s trivial, shallow, and utterly empty of anything resembling
real emotion.
No comments:
Post a Comment